Share |

Sunday, July 20, 2008

ABC News: Can U.S. Catch Up on Plug-In Hybrids?

ABC News: Can U.S. Catch Up on Plug-In Hybrids?

Can Plug-In Hybrids Ride to America's Rescue?

Engineer Behind Many Electric-Car Advances Says Oil's Days May Be Numbered

FONT SIZE
RSS

If the United States breaks its oil addiction, a measure of thanks will no doubt be due to Andy Frank, who some have dubbed the "father of the plug-in hybrid" car.

andrew frank
Andrew Frank, a professor at the University of California, Davis, is considered the godfather of the plug-in hybrid car, which runs 60 miles on electricity from a standard 110-volt wall socket and then switches to liquid fuel.
(Paul Kitagaki Jr./Sacramento Bee/ZUMA Press)

Laboring in near anonymity in his garage-style laboratory on a leafy byway of the University of California at Davis campus, Frank has for three decades focused on developing plug-in-hybrid technology. With his students, he has built nine plug-in vehicles since the 1990s, winning several vehicle contests sponsored by the Department of Energy and automotive companies.

Even so, Detroit showed little interest in the idea of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) -- until recently. With $4-a-gallon gasoline killing SUV sales, big automakers like General Motors, Ford and Toyota have begun to talk about a future with plug-in hybrids -- or even futuristic fuel-cell cars -- instead of SUVs.

Related

Plug-in hybrids go much farther on a single charge than an ordinary hybrid. Some converted Toyota Prius plug-ins get the energy equivalent of 100 miles (or more) per gallon and travel nearly 40 miles on electricity alone before a gasoline engine kicks in for longer trips. With their hefty battery packs, such hybrids can be plugged into a socket in the evening for a charge.

Since 78 percent of American commuters drive 40 miles or less each day, a plug-in driver might need only to fill up his tank with gasoline a half-dozen times a year. It's a game-changing concept that's won over many energy-security hawks and even environmentalists who had been married to futuristic fuel-cell vehicles, but now see plug-ins as a here-and-now way to fight global warming as well as freeing the U.S. from imported oil.

One of the main complaints about plug-in technology is that you're just trading one form of pollution for another -- tailpipe emissions for power-plant smokestack emissions. But a recent "well to wheels" life-cycle analysis by the Electric Power Research Institute and the Natural Resources Defense Council shows that a shift by the U.S. to plug-in vehicles would cut carbon emissions by as much as 500 million tons annually and 10 billion tons cumulatively by 2050. At the same time, other exhaust pollutants would decline.

No comments: